Jordy Whitmer Creating a Treasure Hunt

Creating a WWW Treasure Hunt

Announcements
Course Information
Staff Information
Assignments

 

Treasure Hunt Rubric

Title

Beginning

Developing

Accomplished

Score

0 points

Does not adequately reflect content of Treasure Hunt

1 point

Adequately describes content of Treasure Hunt

2 points

Creative and descriptive

 
Introduction (This section could be used for instructions instead)

0 points

Introduction is perfunctory, with no motivational appeal, relevance, or importance

Introduction doesn't prepare the students for what is to come, or build on what the students already know

1-2 point

Introduction relates somewhat to the student's interests and/or highlights a compelling aspect of the topic

Introduction makes some reference to student's prior knowledge and previews to some extent what the Treasure Hunt is about

3-4 points

The Introduction draws the students into the Treasure Hunt by relating to the learner's interests or goals and/or highlighting a compelling aspect of the topic

The Introduction builds on student's prior knowledge by explicitly mentioning important concepts or principles, and effectively prepares the learner for the Treasure Hunt by foreshadowing new concepts and principles

Questions

0-3 points

Questions not obviously connected to Local, State, or National objectives

Questions merely require recall information

No connection to a broad concept or underlying theme

4-6 points

Questions loosely pertain to Local, State or National objectives

A few questions require higher order thinking skills

Minimal connection is made between the Tasks and an underlying concept/theme

 

7-9 points

Questions address Local, State or National objectives

Variety of question types requiring a balance of recall and higher order thinking skills

Flow from a broad concept/theme

Questions are challenging yet written at a level where students can successfully answer them

Resources

0-2 points

Too few or too many resources used

Reading level does not match students' abilities

Links lead to information that could be found just as easily in a classroom textbook or encyclopedia

3-4 point

Moderate number of resources used

Reading level of some resources match students' abilities

Some links carry information not ordinarily found in a classroom

5-6 points

Appropriate number and variety of resources provided, including off-line resources

Reading level of most resources match students' abilities

Links make excellent use of the WWW's strengths

Quality emphasized over quantity

Linked directly for young or inexperienced users

Big Question (This section could be posed as a task or project instead of a question.)

0-2 points

Question is just a bigger recall question

3-4 point

Question requires students to synthesize some of the information gathered during the Treasure Hunt

5-6 points

Requires students to synthesize what they have learned and shape it into a broader understanding of the topic

Emphasis is on collaboration, inquiry, problem-solving, and decision-making activities requiring evaluation, synthesis, and/or application

 

 

 

Other

0-1 points

Students work individually

No extensions offered

2-3 points

Students compare and discuss answers at the end of the Treasure Hunt

Extensions only offered for "gifted" students

4-5 points

Teams or pairs of students work together during the Treasure Hunt

Challenging for all - Offers extensions for more motivated learners and/or adaptations for students with special needs

 
Total Score

 

    Copyright Information
© 2001-2003, Jordy Whitmer
Materials may be duplicated for personal, not-for-profit use only, provided that full credit is given on all pages. All other uses, transmissions, and duplications are prohibited unless permission is granted expressly.